I’ve got a new SEO project starting and as part of my standard set up i gather data from loads of different sources (including PPC) and create a groovy pivot table that highlights where opportunities and quick wins exist.
When visiting Google Search Console to identify organic keywords that have been clicked in the past 90 days a colleague (Hi Kim!) asked why i was including impressions. I explained that as Google was reporting actual clicks etc then it stands to reason that this is more accurate than Google Keyword Planner.
“Surely not!” she exclaimed.
So I suggested why not ask arguably Google’s best known representative (post Matt Cutts – Sorry Gary Illyes) John Mueller what he thought as he’s proven to be pretty helpful in the past both on Twitter and in the Google Hangouts he holds on a regular basis.
Which sparked the question of whether impression data for keywords ranked on the first page would be the most accurate,
My suspicions confirmed, the impressions data for organic keywords that rank page 1 is more accurate than the average monthly search volume displayed in Google Keyword Planner. This is obviously with the caveat that Search Console includes any personalised or localised listings.
Pretty powerful stuff i’m sure you’ll agree.